Talk:How To Contribute - Revision history

GregorK at 12:40, 15 March 2006

GregorK — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:40:31 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 15 March 2006

-	~~Very interesting~~, ~~thanks! :)~~-<a ~~href="http://celexa~~.~~mortgage~~-~~inf~~.~~info/celexa~~.~~html">celexa</a>~~	+	What to do with Spammers...
		+
		+	We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).
		+
		+	--
		+
		+	Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.
		+
		+	BTW Talk: pages on the wiki tend to attract spam much easier....
		+
		+	Gregor

GregorK: Reverted edit of 85.207.12.82, changed back to last version by 220.110.189.242

GregorK — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:18:43 GMT

Reverted edit of 85.207.12.82, changed back to last version by 220.110.189.242

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 15 March 2006

-	Very interesting, thanks! :)-<a href="http://celexa.mortgage-inf.info/~~index~~.html">celexa</a>	+	Very interesting, thanks! :)-<a href="http://celexa.mortgage-inf.info/celexa.html">celexa</a>

85.207.12.82 at 05:05, 15 March 2006

85.207.12.82 — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:05:16 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 15 March 2006

-	Very interesting, thanks! :)-<a href="http://celexa.mortgage-inf.info/~~celexa~~.html">celexa</a>	+	Very interesting, thanks! :)-<a href="http://celexa.mortgage-inf.info/index.html">celexa</a>

220.110.189.242 at 01:06, 15 March 2006

220.110.189.242 — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:06:46 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 15 March 2006

-	~~What to do with Spammers...~~	+	Very interesting, thanks! :)-<a href="http://celexa.mortgage-inf.info/celexa.html">celexa</a>
-		+
-	~~We already had some Spam here~~, ~~so maybe you should restrict editing~~-~~access to logged in Users. It's~~ a ~~first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them)~~.	+
-		+
-	--	+
-		+
-	~~Not enough spam yet~~..~~. I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.~~	+
-		+
-	~~BTW Talk: pages on the wiki tend to attract spam much easier....~~	+
-		+
-	~~Gregor~~	+

GregorK at 15:51, 28 October 2005

GregorK — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:51:51 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 28 October 2005


	--		--
		+
	Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.		Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.

GregorK at 15:51, 28 October 2005

GregorK — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:51:43 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 28 October 2005

	We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).		We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).

		+	--
	Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.		Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.
		+
	BTW Talk: pages on the wiki tend to attract spam much easier....		BTW Talk: pages on the wiki tend to attract spam much easier....
		+
		+	Gregor

GregorK at 15:51, 28 October 2005

GregorK — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:51:19 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 28 October 2005


	We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).		We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).
		+
		+	Not enough spam yet... I still hope without registration the barrier to write something is lower.
		+	BTW Talk: pages on the wiki tend to attract spam much easier....

ArneBab at 12:12, 28 October 2005

ArneBab — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:12:30 GMT

New page

What to do with Spammers...

We already had some Spam here, so maybe you should restrict editing-access to logged in Users. It's a first barrier and increases the amount of work spammers have to do far beyond the amount of work needed to undo their changes (and to block them).